Home/Issues/Issue 02/Study

Human comparative study; design unconfirmed, abstract not retrieved Publication date verified at source

Two fiber types went head to head on human bile acid profiles

AI narration, generated on first listen
Journal
European Journal of Nutrition
Authors
Fan J, et al.
Published
23 July 2026
Source
PMID 42489745
Design
Human comparison of resistant starch versus polydextrose on plasma and faecal bile acid profiles with microbiota associations; design details unconfirmed because the abstract was not retrieved.
Sample
Human participants; numbers not retrieved.

Fan J et al. published a human comparison of two fiber types, resistant starch and polydextrose, on plasma and faecal bile acid profiles with microbiota associations, in the European Journal of Nutrition on July 23, 2026 (PMID 42489745).

The digest could not retrieve the abstract before PubMed access closed during the run, so no findings, effect sizes or design details are summarized here. The topic is directly relevant to how different fiber types shape bile acid metabolism and the microbiome.

The numbers

Fiber types compared2 (resistant starch, polydextrose)

What this does not show

  • Any result at all. The abstract could not be retrieved before PubMed locked the digest run out. Only the citation and topic are known.
  • The study design. Whether this was a randomized feeding trial, its duration, doses and participant numbers are all unconfirmed.
  • That either fiber is better. No comparison outcome has been read, so no ranking of resistant starch against polydextrose can be stated.

Caveats worth holding

  • The abstract was not retrieved during the digest run, so nothing beyond the citation and topic is verified.
  • Design, doses, duration and sample size are all unknown pending retrieval of the paper.
Appeared in Issue 02 · Topics fiber, gut-health, microbiome
Links: PubMed 42489745

Newsletter

Each issue by email, when the newsletter launches. Leaving your address puts you on the list, nothing is sent yet.